Introduction for the team
For schools that want to see what this is first. The method and the line are covered, without setting up on real tests. The lightest way to start.
No demo to watch. Every participant works on their own laptop, with their own set of tests, and goes home with a working setup.
The outline below is the full day. The half-day covers parts one through four, without the setup on your own tests.
The distinction between the first round and the final judgment, and why that line isn't negotiable. Including the cases where you may hand off nothing at all.
Every participant sets up their settings correctly before a single file is sent. This happens on the day itself, together, not afterward by email.
Exporting from the school platform, pseudonymizing, and getting files into the right format. The practical step that's most often underestimated.
The longest part of the day, and the most important. Every participant writes one for a real test from their own practice.
The first round on a real batch, followed by the review work. This is where you see for yourself where the system is reliable and where it isn't.
How colleagues teaching the same subject share and maintain one grading guide, so the work doesn't happen three times over.
Three formats. Which one fits usually becomes clear from the first half-hour conversation.
For schools that want to see what this is first. The method and the line are covered, without setting up on real tests. The lightest way to start.
Every participant works on their own laptop with a real batch of tests, and goes home with a working setup and a grading guide they can use right away.
For schools that want to keep shared grading guides up to date and let the method grow with the subject team.
What the team learns on the day may be shared internally with colleagues who weren't there. Which format fits becomes clear from a short conversation beforehand.
Are the tests digital, and are teachers allowed to install something on their own laptops? Those two answers shape the day.
They come up first in the intake conversation, so you don't book a day that doesn't fit.
Measurable results from the pilot school will go here once they exist: the average time saved per batch, the share of grades the teacher adjusted, and how many participants were still using the method after three weeks.
Until then, this stays empty. Numbers that haven't been measured don't belong on the website of someone asking schools for trust.
Have you taken the training? Your answers will fill this section. Share your experience — anonymous is fine.
Tell us where your team loses time today. Then you'll know whether this fits — or whether it's still too early.